Jed Randall Burns was booked on Wednesday June, 19th by MFS and was booked into Jackson County Jail in Medford, Oregon.

The male, with a recorded date of birth of Sep 15, 1983 was arrested for suspicion of the below crimes:

1. 0163.684 ENC CHILD SA 1 / ENCOURAGE CHILD SEX ABUSE 1ST DEG

2. 0163.684 ENC CHILD SA 1 / ENCOURAGE CHILD SEX ABUSE 1ST DEG

3. 0163.670 DISP CHILD/SEX / DISPLAY CHILD-SEXUAL CONDUCT
4. 0163.670 DISP CHILD/SEX / DISPLAY CHILD-SEXUAL CONDUCT
5. 0163.432 ONLN SX COR CH 2 / ONLINE SEX CORRUPT CHILD 2
6. 0167.057 LURING A MINOR / LURING A MINOR

Bail has been set to $250000 for Burns which is listed as a 5 foot 9 inch white male weighing approximately 170 pounds.

Jed Randall Burns was arrested in Jackson County Oregon and Jed Randall Burns has a presumption of innocence which means that although the person was arrested, they are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Presumption of innocence” serves to emphasize that the prosecution has the obligation to prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt (or some other level of proof depending on the criminal justice system) and that the accused bears no burden of proof. For more information in presumption of innocence, wikipedia is a great place to start.

This information is made available by the local sheriff’s office in Jackson County Oregon. For more regarding the Jackson County Sheriffs department you can visit their website. They can also be contact them at their contact us page.

Jed Randall Burns is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Oregon Sentencing Guidelines

Disclaimer: Booking information comes directly from the County Sheriff’s Office and we provide no warranty or guarantee as to the quality of the information presented on this site. For the most accurate and up to date information please contact your local sheriff's office. We are unaffiliated with the Sheriff's office and make no guarantees as to the accuracy of this information. Information presented on this site should not be used to determine guilt, determine innocence, generate criminal history, or perform background checks.

---

Below are the Oregon laws which may relate to this arrest:

Using child in display of sexually explicit conduct.
(1) A person commits the crime of using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct if the person employs, authorizes, permits, compels or induces a child to participate or engage in sexually explicit conduct for any person to observe or to record in a visual recording.(2) Using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct is a Class A felony. [1985 c.557 §3; 1987 c.864 §3; 1991 c.664 §5; 2011 c.515 §2]
Online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree.
(1) A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree if the person is 18 years of age or older and:(a) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person or another person, knowingly uses an online communication to solicit a child to engage in sexual contact or sexually explicit conduct; and
(b) Offers or agrees to physically meet with the child.
(2) Online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree is a Class C felony. [2007 c.876 §2]
Luring a minor.
(1) A person commits the crime of luring a minor if the person furnishes to, or uses with, a minor, a police officer posing as a minor or an agent of a police officer posing as a minor, a visual representation or explicit verbal description or narrative account of sexual conduct for the purpose of inducing the minor or purported minor to engage in sexual conduct.(2) A person is not liable to prosecution for violating subsection (1) of this section if the person furnishes or uses a representation, description or account of sexual conduct that forms merely an incidental part of an otherwise nonoffending whole and serves some purpose other than titillation.
(3) In a prosecution under subsection (1) of this section, it is an affirmative defense:
(a) That the representation, description or account was furnished or used for the purpose of psychological or medical treatment and was furnished by a treatment provider or by another person acting on behalf of the treatment provider;
(b) That the defendant had reasonable cause to believe that the person to whom the representation, description or account was furnished or with whom the representation, description or account was used was not a minor; or
(c) That the defendant was less than three years older than the minor or, in the case of a police officer or agent of a police officer posing as a minor, the age of the purported minor as reported to the defendant at the time of the alleged offense.
(4) Luring a minor is a Class C felony.
(5)(a) The court may designate luring a minor as a sex crime under ORS 163A.005 if the court determines that:
(A) The offender reasonably believed the minor or, in the case of a police officer or agent of a police officer posing as a minor, the purported minor to be more than five years younger than the offender or under 16 years of age; and
(B) Given the nature of the offense, the age of the minor or purported minor as reported to the defendant and the person’s criminal history, designation of the offense as a sex crime is necessary for the safety of the community.
(b) The court shall indicate the designation and the findings supporting the designation in the judgment.
(6) As used in this section, police officer has the meaning given that term in ORS 181A.355. [2007 c.869 §3; 2011 c.681 §2; 2013 c.293 §1; 2015 c.101 §1]