Arrest Reports and Laws

Nickolas Stanley Hiatt Arrested

Nickolas Stanley Hiatt was arrested on Tuesday, August 4th 2020 and booked into Clackamas County Jail in Clackamas, Oregon.

Clackamas County Mugshots -  Nickolas Stanley         Hiatt

The male arrested was listed as having a date of birth of 3/9/89 and was arrested for suspicion of the below crimes:

  1. ORS.165.022 - CRIM POSSN FORGED INSTR I
  2. ORS.164.045-1 - THEFT II
  3. ORS.164.045-1 - THEFT II
  4. ORS.164.045-1 - THEFT II
  5. ORS.164.043-1 - FAILURE TO APPEAR THEFT III
  6. ORS.164.055 - THEFT I
  7. ORS.165.803 - AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT
  8. ORS.165.803 - AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT
  9. ORS.165.803 - AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT
  10. ORS.165.803 - AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT
  11. ORS.165.803 - AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT
  12. ORS.165.022 - CRIM POSSN FORGED INSTR I
  13. ORS.165.022 - CRIM POSSN FORGED INSTR I
  14. ORS.165.022 - CRIM POSSN FORGED INSTR I
  15. ORS.165.022 - CRIM POSSN FORGED INSTR I
  16. ORS.165.032 - CRIM POSSN FORGING DEVICE

Bail has been set to 122500 for Hiatt which is listed as a 6.0 ft 0 in white male weighing approximately 170 lbs.

Nickolas Stanley Hiatt was arrested in Clackamas County Oregon and Nickolas Stanley Hiatt has a presumption of innocence which means that although the person was arrested, they are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Presumption of innocence” serves to emphasize that the prosecution has the obligation to prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt (or some other level of proof depending on the criminal justice system) and that the accused bears no burden of proof. For more information in presumption of innocence, wikipedia is a great place to start.

This information is made available by the local sheriff’s office near Clackamas County Oregon. For more regarding the Clackamas County Sheriffs department you can visit their website. They can also be contact them at their about us page.

Nickolas Stanley Hiatt is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Oregon Sentencing Guidelines


Disclaimer: Booking information comes directly from the County Sheriff’s Office and we provide no warranty or guarantee as to the quality of the information presented on this site. For the most accurate and up to date information please contact your local sheriff's office. We are unaffiliated with the Sheriff's office and make no guarantees as to the accuracy of this information. Information presented on this site should not be used to determine guilt, determine innocence, generate criminal history, or perform background checks.



Below are the Oregon laws which may relate to this arrest:


Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.
(1) A person commits the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree if, knowing it to be forged and with intent to utter same, the person possesses a forged instrument of the kind and in the amount specified in ORS 165.013 (1).(2) Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree is a Class C felony. [1971 c.743 §155; 2005 c.761 §2]
Theft in the second degree.
(1) A person commits the crime of theft in the second degree if:(a) By means other than extortion, the person commits theft as defined in ORS 164.015; and
(b) The total value of the property in a single or aggregate transaction is $100 or more and less than $1,000.
(2) Theft in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor. [1971 c.743 §124; 1987 c.907 §3; 1993 c.680 §19; 2009 c.11 §12; 2009 c.16 §2]
Theft in the third degree.
(1) A person commits the crime of theft in the third degree if:(a) By means other than extortion, the person commits theft as defined in ORS 164.015; and
(b) The total value of the property in a single or an aggregate transaction is less than $100.
(2) Theft in the third degree is a Class C misdemeanor. [1987 c.907 §2; 2009 c.11 §11; 2009 c.16 §1]
Theft in the first degree.
(1) A person commits the crime of theft in the first degree if, by means other than extortion, the person commits theft as defined in ORS 164.015 and:(a) The total value of the property in a single or aggregate transaction is $1,000 or more;
(b) The theft is committed during a riot, fire, explosion, catastrophe or other emergency in an area affected by the riot, fire, explosion, catastrophe or other emergency;
(c) The theft is theft by receiving committed by buying, selling, borrowing or lending on the security of the property;
(d) The subject of the theft is a firearm or explosive;
(e) The subject of the theft is a livestock animal, a companion animal or a wild animal removed from habitat or born of a wild animal removed from habitat, pursuant to ORS 497.308 (2)(c); or
(f) The subject of the theft is a precursor substance.
(2) As used in this section:
(a) Companion animal means a dog or cat possessed by a person, business or other entity for purposes of companionship, security, hunting, herding or providing assistance in relation to a physical disability.
(b) Explosive means a chemical compound, mixture or device that is commonly used or intended for the purpose of producing a chemical reaction resulting in a substantially instantaneous release of gas and heat, including but not limited to dynamite, blasting powder, nitroglycerin, blasting caps and nitrojelly, but excluding fireworks as defined in ORS 480.111, black powder, smokeless powder, small arms ammunition and small arms ammunition primers.
(c) Firearm has the meaning given that term in ORS 166.210.
(d) Livestock animal means a ratite, psittacine, horse, gelding, mare, filly, stallion, colt, mule, ass, jenny, bull, steer, cow, calf, goat, sheep, lamb, llama, pig or hog.
(e) Precursor substance has the meaning given that term in ORS 475.940.
(3) Theft in the first degree is a Class C felony. [1971 c.743 §125; 1973 c.405 §1; 1983 c.740 §32; 1987 c.907 §4; 1991 c.837 §9; 1993 c.252 §5; 1993 c.680 §20; 2005 c.706 §10; 2009 c.16 §3; 2009 c.610 §6; 2013 c.24 §11]
Aggravated identity theft.
(1) A person commits the crime of aggravated identity theft if:(a) The person violates ORS 165.800 in 10 or more separate incidents within a 180-day period;
(b) The person violates ORS 165.800 and the person has a previous conviction for aggravated identity theft;
(c) The person violates ORS 165.800 and the losses incurred in a single or aggregate transaction are $10,000 or more within a 180-day period; or
(d) The person violates ORS 165.800 and has in the person’s custody, possession or control 10 or more pieces of personal identification from 10 or more different persons.
(2) Aggravated identity theft is a Class B felony.
(3) As used in this section, previous conviction includes:
(a) Convictions occurring before, on or after January 1, 2008; and
(b) Convictions entered in any other state or federal court for comparable offenses.
(4) The state shall plead in the accusatory instrument and prove beyond a reasonable doubt, as an element of the offense, the previous conviction for aggravated identity theft. [2007 c.584 §1]